Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:24

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why do a lot of autistic people not know how to style their hair?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Scientists Just Found the Oldest Barred Spiral Galaxy – And It’s a Monster - SciTechDaily
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
How does it feel to be in a marriage without any love?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Miley Cyrus Reveals What Caused Her Estrangement from Dad Billy Ray for the First Time - instyle.com
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Finals Film Study: Thunder offense vs. Pacers' defense - NBA
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Astros Announce Major Trade With Rays After Yordan Alvarez News - Athlon Sports